The 78 Percent: How Young Korean Women Have Always Gone Apple
Luxury-adjacent items for young women consumers in Seoul.
A Korean mother sits in a parenting forum in 2022, describing her fourteen-year-old son's meltdown. He'd been crying for three days. He'd punched his bedroom door—twice—leaving dents she couldn't afford to repair. The trigger? She'd purchased him a Samsung Galaxy S22 instead of an iPhone for his middle school graduation gift, thinking she was being practical. The Galaxy cost ₩200,000 less and had better specifications on paper. Her son's response: "You don't understand. I can't go to school with this. They'll think I'm poor" (Hankyung, 2022).
The forums filled with similar stories. A father reported his daughter refused to even open the box containing her new Samsung phone, leaving it untouched on her desk for two weeks. Another parent described their child's ultimatum: "If you won't buy me an iPhone, just give me my grandmother's old iPhone 6. I'd rather have a five-year-old iPhone than any Samsung" (Heraldcorp, 2023). The phrase appeared repeatedly across Korean parenting communities: "아이폰 안 쓰면 왕따" (if you don't use iPhone, you become an outcast).
These weren't tantrums about luxury items. These were children terrified of social exclusion in a peer culture where the green bubble — Android's marker in group chats —had become a scarlet letter. And their parents, many of them loyal Samsung users who'd grown up believing in supporting Korean companies, found themselves trapped between nationalist pride and their children's social survival.
This is the story of how that happened. How a foreign company selling the most expensive phones in Korea captured an entire generation of young women — 78% of them by 2025 — while their mothers remained loyal to Samsung. How premium pricing became an advantage, not a barrier. And how the "national champion" that represents a fifth of Korea's GDP lost the only demographic that matters: the future.
The Statistic That Changes Everything
In 2024, a striking pattern emerged from Gallup Korea's annual smartphone survey: 78% of Korean women aged 18-29 used iPhones (Gallup Korea, 2024). Not 51%. Not 60%. Seventy-eight percent—the highest rate of any demographic globally, exceeding even affluent US coastal cities. Among young men the same age, iPhone adoption dropped to 44%, creating a 34-percentage-point gender gap that fundamentally challenges everything we think we know about Korean consumer behavior (Goover, 2024).
The conventional wisdom about Korea holds that "Koreans prefer Samsung and dislike Apple." This statement is technically accurate — for the overall population. Samsung commands 69% market share versus Apple's 23% (Counterpoint Research, 2024). But this aggregate statistic obscures a demographic earthquake: Korea's future consumers have decisively rejected the domestic champion. Among all 18-29 year-olds, iPhone commands 64% market share, with the gender breakdown revealing an even more dramatic story (Business Korea, 2024).
This isn't merely a preference. It's a near-monopoly among the demographic that determines market trajectories. And it raises an uncomfortable question for Samsung, which represents 20-23% of Korea's GDP: how does a "national champion" lose an entire generation — especially the women who increasingly drive consumer trends?
From Expensive Curiosity to Cultural Phenomenon
Strangely enough, this consumer preference goes all the way back to the seemingly random happenstance of Macintosh computers’ central role as exorbitantly expensive, foreign-made industrial machines crucial to print production in even a development-era Korea, which made Macs expensive, Apple an unapproachable price point to the average Korean, and hence branded an unattainable dream object. This notion extended well past the days of Mac Quadras and the first versions of Mac-only Aldus PageMaker and Adobe Photoshop’s first versions.
Apple's Korean journey began inauspiciously. Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, Macintosh computers commanded a meager 2-3% of Korea's PC market—confined to a specific professional niche where they weren't a choice but a necessity (Namu Wiki, 2024). Graphic designers, desktop publishers, and print production specialists had to use Macs because the software that revolutionized their industries — Aldus PageMaker (1985), QuarkXPress (1987), Adobe Photoshop, and Adobe Illustrator — either ran exclusively on Macintosh or performed significantly better on Apple's platform (Wikipedia, 2024).
The "desktop publishing revolution" that started in 1985 when Apple launched the Macintosh, PageMaker, and the LaserWriter printer on the same day created a technical monopoly: if you worked in graphic design or publishing in Korea, you bought a Mac not because you loved Apple, but because PageMaker and QuarkXPress were the only tools that could produce professional-quality layouts (Design Software History, 2024). By the early 1990s, QuarkXPress commanded 90-95% of the global professional publishing market, and it ran best on Macs (Quark History, 2023). A handful of design-focused high schools adopted Macs for training students in these industry-standard tools (Busan Craft High School in 1993, Yeonsu Women's Technical High School in 1994), but market share never exceeded 2-3% of personal computers.
The iPod, despite revolutionizing music globally, captured less than 2% of Korea's robust MP3 player market by 2005, losing badly to domestic champions iRiver, Samsung, and Cowon (Korea Wikipedia, 2024). The iPod's critical advantage elsewhere —the iTunes Music Store — didn't exist in Korea, severely limiting integration value.
The iPhone's delayed November 2009 launch resulted from structural barriers and competitive opposition. The WIPI (Wireless Internet Platform for Interoperability) mandate required all Korean phones to include government-specified software; Apple refused, creating a standoff lasting until WIPI's abolition in April 2009 (ET News, 2012). More tellingly, Samsung explicitly lobbied to delay iPhone's introduction, understanding the existential threat it posed (Korea Herald, 2019). The device earned the sarcastic nickname "다음달폰" (The “Next Month Phone”) as launch dates repeatedly slipped.
When KT finally secured exclusive carrier rights — following Apple's pattern of partnering with second-place telecoms to break market leader dominance — the response defied all projections. Pre-orders reached 27,000 units before launch. The device hit 100,000 sales in 10 days, 1 million within 10 months, and 2 million by January 2011 (Korea Wikipedia, 2009). Apple Korea's revenue exploded tenfold from 2009 to 2010, reaching ₩1.5-2 trillion. More significantly, Korea reached 10 million smartphone users just 16 months after iPhone's launch (ET News, 2012).
But the real story wasn't in these impressive early numbers. It was in who was buying, and why.
The Gender Divide Nobody Predicted
The pattern revealed itself gradually through successive Gallup Korea surveys. In 2016, just 41% of twenty-somethings used iPhones. By 2024, this had surged to 64%—but the growth concentrated overwhelmingly among young women who increased from 58% iPhone adoption in 2021 to 75% in 2024 and 78% in 2025 (Gallup Korea, 2024, 2025).
Male patterns told a contrasting story. Young men (18-29) showed 55% iPhone adoption in 2024, dropping to 44% in 2025—still substantial but declining and now minority preference. Men in their 30s decisively favor Samsung (65% vs 32% iPhone), and older male demographics overwhelmingly use Samsung (77-86%) (Business Korea, 2024). Every male age group now prefers Samsung over iPhone, yet young women's opposite preference drives overall youth iPhone dominance.
Counterpoint Research data confirms women in their 20s comprise half of all iPhone users in Korea despite representing perhaps 15-20% of the total population (Hankyung Magazine, 2025). This concentration reveals the iPhone as primarily a young female phenomenon that secondarily captures young males, creative professionals, and scattered older adopters — fundamentally different from Samsung's broad demographic base.
The gap has widened over time, not narrowed, suggesting self-reinforcing network effects: as more young women adopt iPhones, peer pressure intensifies on remaining Samsung users, driving further conversion (Korea Herald, 2023).
"디자인이 예쁘다": Design as Emotional Technology
Survey data reveals why young Korean women prefer the iPhone, and the reasons challenge conventional technology marketing wisdom. "디자인이 예쁘다" (the design is pretty) ranks as the most cited reason —Apple's minimalist aesthetic and attention to industrial design resonate with Korean women's design consciousness (Goover, 2024). University student Park exemplifies this: "It's pretty. Other devices fail to match the iPhone's design aesthetics." The visible Apple logo functions as fashion accessory as much as technology indicator.
But "pretty" means something specific. Camera quality — specifically the "감성" (gamseong, emotional/aesthetic quality)—drives significant adoption. Unlike Galaxy's bright, sharp image processing that young women describe as "too good" and "tacky" (촌스럽다), iPhone cameras produce warmer, darker tones with a "vintage aesthetic" (Financial News, 2025). Korean media documented a secondary market for older iPhone models (SE, iPhone 6) among twenty-something women, specifically purchasing them for camera aesthetics despite inferior specs. One woman explained: "Galaxy's image quality is too good, it loses the emotional feeling" (Hankyung, 2022).
This prioritization of emotional resonance over technical superiority fundamentally differs from traditional male-oriented technology marketing focused on specifications. Instagram culture amplifies iPhone's advantages among young women. Youth under 20 spend double the time on Instagram versus KakaoTalk, making visual-first platforms central to social life (Korea Herald, 2025). iPhone's perceived superiority for Instagram content creation — better photo output, optimal app integration, easier content sharing via AirDrop — provides a functional advantage in digitally-mediated social competition.
Female K-pop idols' Instagram selfies predominantly feature visible iPhones, creating aspirational modeling that drives imitation psychology (Heraldcorp, 2025). When Blackpink members switched from Galaxy to iPhone, the Korean media extensively covered it. This influencer effect operates with particular power in Korea's celebrity-driven consumer culture where entertainment industry trends cascade rapidly to youth audiences.
The Peer Pressure Engine
At any given professional photo shoot in Korea, in which a friednly photographer, makeup artist, or other creative has taken pictures or video of/for others to share on social media, it often ends up offered in inpromptu Airdrop sessions, but woe unto any non-iPhone user, who always has to wait for the charity of an iPhone user who says “I’ll get it to you on Kakao later” (with degraded image quality, of course).
The dynamics approach coercion. Multiple Korean sources document students reporting "아이폰 안 쓰면 왕따" (if you don't use iPhone, you become an outcast) (Hankyung, 2022). Parents describe children crying and breaking doors when denied iPhones, citing fear of social exclusion. One parent lamented: "Friends all use iPhone, I can't not buy it. They say using Samsung leads to ostracism" (Inews24, 2024).
The iMessage blue bubble versus Android green bubble discrimination—where green bubbles mark outsiders excluded from certain games, features, and group dynamics—creates tangible social costs for Samsung users (Korea Herald, 2025). Calling someone "갤럭시남" (Galaxy-man) functions as mild insult suggesting outdated, uncool, older demographics. Female college students report they "don't want to be contacted by someone with Galaxy" (Heraldcorp, 2023).
Academic research on Korean luxury consumption psychology explains why these dynamics operate with particular intensity. Collectivist cultures like Korea produce higher public self-consciousness than individualist Western societies, making brand choices highly visible social signals (Korean academic research via Goover, 2024). Status signaling and belonging motivations strongly predict luxury purchase intention. Gen Z research specifically identifies "conformity" (동조성) and "scarcity" (희소성) as the strongest predictors of luxury brand loyalty—when peers adopt premium brands, social pressure to conform intensifies dramatically.
Korean media analysis positions young women as "trend leaders" (유행 선도자) who set consumption patterns that men later follow to increase social desirability (Ledesk, 2024). This creates cascade effects where women's technology choices eventually influence broader male adoption. The current pattern—young women at 78% iPhone, young men declining to 44%—suggests either an inflection point where men resist female-led trends, or Samsung's successful counter-marketing targeting male users specifically.
The Pricing Paradox
Korea maintains some of the world's highest iPhone prices yet shows accelerating premium market growth. The iPhone 16 costs ₩1.25 million in Korea versus ₩1.05 million in Japan and approximately ₩1.17 million in the US after tax adjustment—a 6-18% Korean premium (KED Global, 2023). This pricing gap stems from multiple sources: Apple applies unfavorable exchange rates when setting Korean prices, raises prices when the won weakens but rarely lowers them proportionally when it strengthens, and deliberately positions higher in Korea than comparable markets.
The iPhone 14 (128GB) cost ₩1.25 million versus Galaxy S23's ₩1.15 million—a ₩100,000 (8.7%) iPhone premium (KED Global, 2023). This 8-12% iPhone premium for equivalent models has remained consistent over the past seven years. Samsung has never successfully positioned its flagships above iPhone prices, effectively conceding premium market psychology to Apple.
Korea's smartphone market shows the highest Average Selling Price globally at approximately ₩900,000 per device—2.4 times the global average of ₩370,000 (Counterpoint Research, 2024). The iPhone 16's ₩1.25 million price represents 31-42% of Korean average monthly income (₩3-4 million), seemingly prohibitive. Yet the effective monthly cost tells a different story.
The carrier subsidy system transforms sticker prices into manageable payments. Until July 2025, the "공시지원금" (public subsidy) system legally mandated carrier subsidies capped around ₩345,000 (~30% of device price), with retailers adding up to 15% extra (Korea Herald, 2024). Total subsidies reached ₩400,000-680,000 depending on model and carrier. For iPhone 16's ₩1.25 million price, ₩680,000 in subsidies reduced the net cost to ₩570,000. Spread across standard 24-month installment plans at 5.9% annual interest, monthly device payments approximate ₩24,000-25,000 plus data plan costs.
This financing structure means iPhone costs just 0.6-0.8% of monthly income rather than the sticker price's 31-42%. A ₩25,000 monthly payment proves manageable even for part-time workers (earning ~₩1.7 million monthly) or students with parental support (Moyoplan, 2024). The July 2025 subsidy law repeal removing caps entirely may trigger "subsidy wars" where carriers offer phones at minimal or zero upfront cost with premium service plans.
The pricing paradox resolves when recognizing that high prices function as feature rather than bug in status-conscious Korean society. Academic research on Korean luxury consumption identifies premium pricing as credible signal of quality that cannot be easily faked in hierarchical social structures (Korean academic sources via Goover, 2024). Visible consumption matters more in collectivist cultures with high public self-consciousness. The "face" culture (체면) requires maintaining appropriate status through consumption choices. iPhone's premium positioning enhances rather than detracts from appeal among youth seeking status markers.
Survey data confirms Korean smartphone buyers prioritize brand reputation first, build quality and design second, ecosystem compatibility third, and price ranks only fourth or fifth in importance (DirectResearchKorea, 2024). Apple maintains the highest brand loyalty of any brand in Korea at 85% (versus Samsung's 65%), with 92% of those who had iPhone as their first smartphone staying with the brand (Korea Herald, 2023). This lock-in effect means that securing young users—even at subsidized initial prices—guarantees lifetime customer value far exceeding initial acquisition costs.
Generational Rebellion Against the National Champion
Perhaps the most surprising dimension of Apple's Korean success is how it overcomes rather than accommodates Korean nationalism—and how that very foreignness became advantage among younger generations explicitly rejecting their parents' values. Samsung represents 20-23% of Korea's GDP, making it far more than a company—it's a symbol of the "Miracle on the Han River" economic transformation, national pride, and Korean achievement on the global stage (Statista, 2024). Employment at Samsung ranks as pinnacle career success. Older generations (40+) show 77-86% Samsung market share, reflecting this nationalist economic pride combined with practical feature preferences (Business Korea, 2024).
Yet among 18-29 year-olds—the generation that should inherit this nationalism—iPhone dominates with 64% share despite being expensive foreign technology. This represents fundamental generational shift in how national identity relates to consumption. Professor Lee Eun-hee of Inha University observes that younger generations are "drawn to the idea of owning an iPhone, perhaps even more than the device itself"—a way to differentiate from older generations and signal membership in global rather than merely Korean culture (Korea Herald, 2023).
Multiple forces converged to weaken nationalist consumption among Korean youth. The 1997 IMF financial crisis that devastated the economy occurred during their formative years or affected their parents directly, creating skepticism toward chaebols and traditional economic structures. Globalization and internet connectivity integrated Korean youth into global cultural flows more than any previous generation. The Hallyu (Korean Wave) success paradoxically made Korean youth more globally-oriented—their cultural exports' international success validated global rather than local frame of reference.
Technology brand choice has become an "age marker" in Korean society — a visible generational identity signal more than functional decision (Korea Herald, 2025). Fourteen-year-olds describe Samsung as "bland, catering to people of all ages but appealing to none." The association iPhone+Instagram+YouTube versus Samsung+KakaoTalk+Naver maps directly onto young versus old cultural divides. One student noted Instagram's appeal partially because "it's free of parents' monitoring," positioning the platform—and by extension iPhone optimized for it — as a generational boundary marker.
Apple successfully navigated this cultural terrain through several strategic moves. Premium-only positioning avoided the "cheap" associations that hurt Samsung's brand among youth — by never offering budget models, iPhone maintains exclusivity. The ecosystem approach created new community identity (Apple users as tribe) that competes with national identity. Experiential retail (Apple Stores as destinations) resonates with experience economy values. K-pop collaborations and celebrity endorsements culturally localized while maintaining global premium status.
Critically, Apple's positioning as complement rather than competitor to the Korean economy diffuses nationalist opposition. Apple Stores create Korean jobs. iPhones use Samsung components and displays (Korea Herald, 2025). The relationship can be framed as partnership rather than zero-sum competition, allowing youth to adopt iPhone without feeling they betray Korea.
Samsung faces the "national champion paradox": its very success as an establishment pillar makes it difficult to appeal to youth seeking differentiation and rebellion. The company attempted counter-strategies — Galaxy Z Flip targeting 20-30s women with fashionable foldable design showed some success; the Samsung Gangnam store copying Apple's experiential retail approach; marketing emphasizing creativity and lifestyle over specifications (Korea Herald, 2022). Yet structural disadvantage persists: how does the symbol of parental generation, corporate establishment, and traditional Korean economic model appeal to youth explicitly rejecting those associations?
What This Means
Apple's Korean success demonstrates how premium foreign brands can overcome nationalist competition, price disadvantages, and market power concentration through strategic alignment with generational psychology, status dynamics, and cultural transformation. The transformation occurred not despite but because of factors that seemed like obstacles—premium pricing enhanced status signaling value, foreign origin enabled generational differentiation, and Samsung's national champion status became the establishment association to rebel against.
The demographic data proves decisive. With 78% of 18-29 year-old women using iPhone and 64% of young adults overall, Apple has captured Korea's future consumers. The 85-90% brand loyalty rate ensures these users remain iPhone customers as they age, make higher incomes, and gain greater purchasing power (Korea Herald, 2023). Every year, older Samsung-dominated cohorts diminish while younger iPhone-dominated cohorts expand, creating an inexorable demographic replacement favoring Apple.
Samsung's 60% current market share masks structural vulnerability. The company dominates 40+ demographics (77-86% share) and older male demographics, while losing catastrophically among young women and declining among young men (Business Korea, 2024). Unless Samsung reverses youth market trends—difficult when its establishment positioning intrinsically conflicts with youth rebellion impulses—demographics ensure steady Apple market share gains over the next decade.
The gender dimension challenges assumptions about technology consumption. The overwhelming female preference for iPhone among Korean youth (78% vs 44% male) reflects broader Asian dynamics where young women lead technology trends, prioritize design and experience over specifications, and use premium devices as social signaling mechanisms. Technology companies ignoring female consumers in Asian markets miss the primary driver of premium adoption.
Korean nationalism's collapse in technology consumption warns of similar shifts elsewhere. When generational identity and global cultural integration compete with nationalist economics, younger consumers increasingly choose the former. Korean youth feel no obligation to buy domestic champions when foreign alternatives better express their values and identities.
Apple's Korean success ultimately demonstrates how ecosystem approaches with high switching costs, combined with experiential retail and cultural localization, can build dominant positions even entering late against entrenched local competitors. The company has transformed from selling expensive niche hardware to controlling Korea's youth technology ecosystem—and through brand loyalty, securing those customers for decades to come.
The question is no longer whether Apple can succeed in Korea, but whether Samsung can defend its home market against the demographic tide that started with 78% of young women choosing differently than their mothers.
FINITO
AI Usage Statement
This article was developed through a collaborative human-AI research process. The author directed the research scope, identified Korean sources as authoritative, selected the analytical frameworks, provided the core insights about gender demographics and generational dynamics, and determined the Malcolm Gladwell-inspired narrative structure. Claude AI assisted with: conducting comprehensive searches of Korean and English-language sources, synthesizing academic and journalistic materials, organizing the extensive research findings into coherent sections, and formatting citations according to APA guidelines.
The interpretive work—identifying the "78 percent" as the central revelation, recognizing the premium pricing paradox, understanding the generational rebellion against Samsung as national champion, and analyzing the gender-specific consumption psychology—represents human analytical contributions. AI served as research assistant and writing collaborator, accelerating the literature review process and enabling the integration of Korean-language sources that would have been prohibitively time-consuming to synthesize manually.
This methodology aligns with emerging academic standards for AI disclosure (Duke Learning Innovation, 2025; Stanford Report, 2025; UCSB Writing Program, 2024), which distinguish between AI as mechanical assistant for literature review and citation management versus AI as originator of core intellectual insights. The human researcher maintained complete control over argument development, source evaluation, and theoretical framing throughout the research and writing process.
References
Business Korea. (2024). 86% of Korean users in their 50s and 60s prefer Galaxy while 64% of 18-29 year-olds choose iPhones. Business Korea. https://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=221111
Counterpoint Research. (2024). 국내 스마트폰 점유율: 분기별 데이터 [Domestic smartphone market share: Quarterly data]. Counterpoint Research Korea. https://korea.counterpointresearch.com/
Design Software History. (2024). Aldus PageMaker: Revolutionizing design with desktop publishing in the 1980s. Novedge. https://novedge.com/blogs/design-news/design-software-history-aldus-pagemaker-revolutionizing-design-with-desktop-publishing-in-the-1980s
DirectResearchKorea. (2024). Bite into the apple! Apple's retail and product strategy in South Korea. DirectResearchKorea. https://www.thedrk.com/post/bite-into-the-apple-apple-s-retail-and-product-strategy-in-south-korea
Duke Learning Innovation. (2025). Artificial intelligence policies: Guidelines and considerations. Duke Learning Innovation & Lifetime Education. https://lile.duke.edu/ai-and-teaching-at-duke-2/artificial-intelligence-policies-in-syllabi-guidelines-and-considerations/
ET News. (2012). [100대 사건_085] 뒤늦은 아이폰 열풍, 한반도를 강타하다 <2009년 11월> [100 major events_085: The belated iPhone craze hits the Korean Peninsula]. ET News. https://www.etnews.com/201209110631
Financial News. (2025). 10~40대 여성 아이폰 사용률 더 높아졌다 [iPhone usage rates among women in their 10s-40s have increased]. Financial News. https://www.fnnews.com/news/202507072346172504
Gallup Korea. (2024). 한국갤럽조사연구소 [Korea Gallup Research Institute smartphone survey]. Gallup Korea. https://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=1497
Gallup Korea. (2025). 한국갤럽조사연구소 [Korea Gallup Research Institute smartphone survey]. Gallup Korea. https://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=1497
Goover. (2024). 세대별 한국 스마트폰 사용 현황 분석: 아이폰 vs 갤럭시 [Analysis of smartphone usage by generation in Korea: iPhone vs Galaxy]. Goover. https://seo.goover.ai/report/202409/go-public-report-ko-b8d687b9-b136-4fa7-88a5-f291114351f7-0-0.html
Hankyung. (2022). "아이폰 안 쓰면 왕따"…대성통곡한 초등학생 이유 알고 보니 ["If you don't use iPhone, you're ostracized"...The reason elementary school students cry]. Hankyung. https://www.hankyung.com/article/202209266494g
Hankyung Magazine. (2025). 희비 엇갈린 애플·삼성전자...국내 스마트폰 시장이 바뀌다 [Apple and Samsung's contrasting fortunes...The domestic smartphone market is changing]. Hankyung Magazine. https://magazine.hankyung.com/business/article/202503179606b
Heraldcorp. (2023). "ㅋ 연예인 아이폰만 쓰는데?" 얼굴 가린 뜻밖에 '여성' 누군가 했더니 ["LOL, celebrities only use iPhones?" Who was the unexpected 'woman' with covered face]. Heraldcorp. https://mbiz.heraldcorp.com/article/3212161
Heraldcorp. (2025). "삼성 쓰면 왕따" 비싼 아이폰 타령, 너무 심하다 했더니…결국 '특단' 조치 ["Using Samsung makes you an outcast" - The expensive iPhone complaints got too severe, so they finally took 'drastic' measures]. Heraldcorp. https://mbiz.heraldcorp.com/article/10426527
Inews24. (2024). [초점] "아이폰 안 쓰면 왕따" 잘파세대 심화…'아재폰' 탈출 나선 삼성 전략은 [[Focus] "If you don't use iPhone, you're an outcast" - Gen Z intensifies...Samsung's strategy to escape 'old man phone']. Inews24. https://www.inews24.com/view/1614866
KED Global. (2023). Want to buy an iPhone 15 in South Korea? Pay more. KED Global. https://www.kedglobal.com/electronics/newsView/ked202309130017
Korea Herald. (2019). SKT to break KT's iPhone monopoly. Korea Herald. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20110306000293
Korea Herald. (2022). '아이폰 절대 지지' 2030 여성도 "예쁘다" 연발하는 Z플립 [위기의 갤럭시 下] ['Absolute iPhone supporters' - Even women in their 20s and 30s repeatedly say "It's pretty" about Z Flip [Galaxy in crisis part 2]]. Korea Herald. https://www.hankyung.com/article/202210214196g
Korea Herald. (2023). Young Koreans favor iPhones over Samsung Galaxy: Survey. Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20230720000592
Korea Herald. (2024). Korea ends phone subsidy law: Are cheaper smartphones coming? Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10535454
Korea Herald. (2025). How your tech choices show your age in South Korea. Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/3466695
Korea Wikipedia. (2009). 대한민국의 아이폰 출시 [iPhone launch in South Korea]. Korean Wikipedia. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/대한민국의_아이폰_출시
Korea Wikipedia. (2024). Apple - 나무위키 [Apple - Namu Wiki]. Namu Wiki. https://namu.wiki/w/Apple
Ledesk. (2024). 르데스크 - 여성에 잘 보이고 싶은 남성들, 젊어지고 싶은 기성세대 "나도 아이폰" [Ledesk - Men who want to look good to women, older generations who want to be younger: "Me too, iPhone"]. Ledesk. https://www.ledesk.co.kr/view.php?uid=9830
Moyoplan. (2024). 휴대폰 살 때 공시지원금 받는게 좋을까? (공시지원금 뜻과 장단점) [Is it better to receive public subsidies when buying a phone? (Meaning and pros/cons of public subsidies)]. Moyoplan. https://www.moyoplan.com/phones/contents/n/disclosure-subsidy
Namu Wiki. (2024). iPhone/대한민국 현황 [iPhone/South Korea status]. Namu Wiki. https://namu.wiki/w/iPhone/대한민국%20현황
Quark History. (2023). The history of Quark. Quark. https://www.quark.com/about/blog/40th-anniversary-quark-part-one
Stanford Report. (2025). University guidelines on artificial intelligence in academic work. Stanford University.
Statista. (2024). Samsung's GDP revenue contribution. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1314374/south-korea-samsung-groups-revenue-as-a-share-of-gdp/
UCSB Writing Program. (2024). AI writing guidelines and disclosure requirements. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Wikipedia. (2024). Aldus PageMaker. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldus_PageMaker